The revised “Administrative Measures for the Recognition and Registration of Technology Contracts” takes effect on March 1, 2026

The “Administrative Measures for the Recognition and Registration of Technology Contracts” was first issued and implemented in 1990, and revised in 2000. On February 9, 2026, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released the second revised version of this Measures.

Recognition and registration of technology contracts are not mandatory requirements, instead they are conducted on a voluntary application basis. What are the benefits of such procedures? Similar to copyright registration, its main value lies in proving ownership and the formation date of rights in the event of infringement disputes. If procedures have been completed, the registration certificate will serve as strong evidence in subsequent disputes over infringement, breach of contract, or other claims.

This 2026 revision introduces several major changes:

First, the scope of registrable contracts adds more type. On the basis of the 4 contract types specified in the 2000 version—technology development contract, technology transfer contract, technology consulting contract, and technology service contract—technology license contract is newly added. This addition is highly necessary. In cases of patent infringement or trade secret misappropriation, where the infringer’s gains or the right holder’s losses cannot be determined, royalty fees serve as a key reference for calculating compensation. In many cases, however, infringers defend by claiming that the license contract was forged after the infringement. Registration effectively defeats such defenses. Right holders should also ensure that payment and invoicing comply with the contract to form a complete chain of evidence.

Second, adjustment of the registration party. The 2000 version required registration by the seller. The 2026 version addresses frequent disputes in practice by adding two scenarios: (1) If the seller is reluctant to register, the buyer may register upon mutual agreement of all parties; and (2) For contracts with multiple sellers, each seller shall register separately at its locality based on its respective transaction volume. It shall be noted that registration by the buyer is not automatic when the seller refuses, and it requires the seller’s consent. This rule ensures that registration decisions are made by the right holder and prevents improper acts such as forgery of technology contracts by the buyer.

Third, confidentiality protection. The 2026 version adds provisions requiring that technology contracts involving state secrets be registered after declassification processing, or be submitted for recognition and registration to registration institutions with confidentiality qualifications. It is a pity that such special requirement could not be applied to ordinary trade secrets. Given the importance of trade secret protection, enterprises may also consider applying for recognition and registration at institutions with confidentiality qualifications.